If you are a member of the media, please email ngarcia@azcc.gov or call (602) 542-0728.
Phoenix, Ariz. — At the Arizona
Corporation Commission’s (ACC) February 19, 2026, special open meeting, the
Commission voted 4-1 (with Commissioner Lea Márquez Peterson dissenting) to
approve UNS Gas, Inc.’s (UNSG) application to implement an Annual Rate
Adjustment Mechanism (ARAM). This marks the first regulated utility rate
case in which the Commission considered and approved an alternative ratemaking
method. The ARAM methodology allows the utility rates to be adjusted annually
based upon a Commission-approved formula and review process.
“The
approved ARAM will help address regulatory lag, promote rate gradualism for
ratepayers, and introduce meaningful regulatory efficiencies,” said Chairman
Nick Myers. “Similar methods are used at the federal level and in various
states across the country. However, as this is our first attempt in Arizona,
the Commission will be especially watchful to make sure the ARAM operates as
intended and results in just and reasonable rates.”
The ARAM
will help improve transparency and oversight, reduce administrative costs,
eliminate several of UNSG’s existing adjustor mechanisms, allow UNSG to access
capital at lower rates to the benefit of customers, may result in rate
decreases, and promotes rate gradualism. The ARAM methodology includes
extensive public notice requirements, informal and formal challenge periods,
ACC Staff’s comprehensive review of all data provided, and the Commission’s
consideration and vote on any rate adjustment.
“The
ARAM will require the Commission to review and approve all expenditures,
including capital investment, each year instead of only reviewing test year
financials,” said Vice Chair Rachel Walden. “Savings, such as those
resulting from the One Big Beautiful Bill corporate tax cuts will be passed
onto customers via the ARAM. In every state that has implemented formula
ratemaking, their electricity rates are below national average, and annual
increases, if any, have been well below the rate of inflation, or 1% - 1 ½% per
year. To me, that is a step in the right direction for affordability.”
Several
amendments submitted by Commissioners further strengthened oversight and
reduced revenues for the utility. The Commission approved a 9.61% return
on equity and decreased the Fair Value Increment (FVI) to 0.00% - this means
reduced profits for the utility, a reduction in bill impact for customers, and
a better credit rating and lower cost-of-debt for the utility, which will also
benefit customers.
“Today’s
outcome strikes a fair balance between protecting ratepayers from dramatic rate
increases and ensuring a healthy and viable utility that can continue to safely
provide critical services to customers,” said Commissioner Kevin
Thompson. “We’ve consistently heard from ratepayers that they’d prefer
rate increases be gradually spread out over time and not experience dramatic
increases more frequently. The Commission adopted several amendments that
enhance the recommended order and further protect ratepayers and promote
transparency.”
All
documents related to this case can be found in the ACC’s eDocket system at https://edocket.azcc.gov/
, Docket No. G-04204A-24-0237.